Submitted by Karen Frostig: As co-facilitator of critical pedagogy’s most recent meeting in October, I’ve been invited to write a blog, not be confused with a summary report of the meeting.
The meeting’s agenda was to solicit sample vignettes from faculty, where issues of power and oppression, racism, sexism and exclusions of all kinds, became the focal point of classroom discourse. One faculty discussed an incident and named her experience as an “ouch” moment, where one or more people experienced pain, shame, discomfort, rage, while others scrambled to find language to further critical reflection and collective investigation. A few more examples were also presented.
It might be useful to think about these moments in a broader context, as opportunities rather than collision sites or blind spots. I left the meeting wondering whether faculty were looking for intervention techniques that would be culturally responsive, as well as aid in circumventing the likelihood of future “ouch” moments, erupting in the classroom.
While empathy is wedded to imagination, emerging in the development of a young child–often in response to how the child was treated by parents and caregivers– critical thinking is a conceptual process, seen as the culmination of cognitive development. It is not necessarily a given. Students working with young children are immersed in educational environments where literal thinking and concrete thinking dominate classroom experience. Critical thinking can often appear as unfamiliar terrain.
In addition to these developmental considerations, I am a firm believer that as long as we have privilege and oppression in the world, we will have “ouch” moments, where the pretend game comes to a screeching halt. These are wake up calls that provide educators with a rich opportunity to develop real conversations about things that matter between people in the room. The task-at-hand is to create safety, so that exploration can unfold. The dialogue is not to become so facile so as to eliminate these moments of great import.
At the same time, we need to consider students’ contracts and program expectations. For example, Creative Arts and Learning is marketed as an educational program. The line between education, critical pedagogy, citizenship, consciousness-raising, personal growth and therapy can quickly become quite dynamic, overwhelming some students who just bargained for a little “curriculum enhancement” packaging. How do web sites represent programs? What kind of training should be in place for faculty to tackle difficult topics that may emerge from any number of directions? How do these unruly moments mirror what teachers face day-to-day in the classroom?
_________
Coincidentally, from the news desk…
An item concerning the very topic that touched off the discussion in our meeting, was broadcast on CNN the morning we met. The story concerned the cover image on French Vogue Magazine, where a white model’s face was painted black for a photo shoot. An international debate quickly ensued, examining whether this was a racist or, at the very least, a culturally insensitive act…take a listen…